Tools F261 cycle highway: dealing with confusion points

F261 cycle highway: dealing with confusion points
Playlist
Confusion points
Tooltype
Example
Scale
Route
Location
Tilburg, Loon op Zand, Waalwijk (the Netherlands)
Tool provider
Name
CHIPS consortium (Lisette Hoeke)
Readability tool main characteristics
Title
F261 cycle highway: dealing with confusion points
Playlist
Confusion points
Tooltype
Example
Scale
Route
Does the readability tool encompass a certain location?
Yes
Location
Tilburg, Loon op Zand, Waalwijk (the Netherlands)
To whom is the tool primarily directed?
New user (e.g. someone who wants to try it)
Readability tool branding strategy
Is the tool related to
Cycle highway
Name of cycle highway
F261 Cycle Highway
Is this cycle highway related to a branded network of cycle highways?
Not relevant

Slide 1
Slide 2
Slide 3
Slide 4
Readability tool description
Readability tool description

Once you enter a cycle highway you know you just have to cycle straight forward. But sometimes users might find it more difficult to see what cycling straight forward exactly means. On these confusion points extra readability measures can help users to find their way. On the F261 cycle highway (CHIPS pilot) new wayfinding concepts were tested:

  1. example of straight ahead but a nice cycle path on the left: an extra sign is placed to confirm the route is straight ahead
  2. example of a curved road with two directions: an extra sign and road surface marks are placed to highlight the route.
  3. example of a roandabout which can be confusing: a specific sign for roundabouts is designed to solve this solution
  4. example of a crossing and change of side of the road: a sign is placed before the crossing and road surface markings are placed before and after the crossing.
Functionality
  • Different solutions specific for the type of confusion point.
  • Combination of signposts and road surface markings
  • If it's needed, there is confirmation (after the confusion point) to indicate that the cyclist is riding in the right direction
  • Diffenent solutions might be confusing (less standardisation)
  • Pilot: no decision is made yet on how to solve these confusion points

These are the examples that are tested. Decisions about the final strategy/solution(s) need to be made before this can be rolled out in the Netherlands.

Join the discussion

FILL THE GAP!

Contribute to the Readability toolbox!

Your idea or example might help others and feed new ideas.